Formulae for String Calculations
John Delacour
JD at Pianomaker.co.uk
Tue Oct 3 16:59:49 MDT 2006
At 11:25 am +0200 3/10/06, Ric Brekne wrote:
>My question is, whether or not spreadsheets and string calculation
>programs generally take into account these end lengths for basic
>scaling work ? How important is it to gain the extra accuracy in
>taking into account these endlenghts, hex/round... etc factors ?
So far as calculating tension etc., the matters I dealt with in the
web page, not at all. As I explained in the last paragraph, the tiny
differences involved are not significant in the basic calculations.
But as regards the tonal quality of the string, inharmonicity etc.
these things do matter. We aim to start the copper about 8 to 10 mm
from the bridge pin and leave about 15mm bare at the top bridge. If
I'm working from a rubbing I have taken myself then I will reduce
these figures. The first two pictures below illustrate "Erard
whipping" and "Steinway whipping", both of which lend greater purity
or clarity to the tone. Unless we are asked for unwhipped strings,
which we never are, we use the Erard or Bechstein style of whipping
on all bichords and trichords. The Steinway syle of whipping takes
more time and we charge extra. Steinway stopped bothering to whip
their strings some time before WW2 but Bechsteins have always been
whipped.
The third picture shows the end of one of our typical double-covered
strings, which, as you see, has a shorter shoulder than is found on
most makers' strings. This also makes a slight difference to
inharmonicity, as does the ratio of the two covers.
So the answer in brief is that these things are irrelevant in your
"basic scaling work" but in combination, including other factors too,
make a huge difference to the quality of sound produced by the
strings.
JD
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech/attachments/20061003/4598de42/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: P0632DC15 3.png
Type: image/png
Size: 63498 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech/attachments/20061003/4598de42/attachment-0003.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: P0632DC15 4.png
Type: image/png
Size: 56686 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech/attachments/20061003/4598de42/attachment-0004.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: P0632DC15 5.png
Type: image/png
Size: 63129 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech/attachments/20061003/4598de42/attachment-0005.png
More information about the Pianotech
mailing list