Franz Mohr in Moscow
Alan Barnard
tune4u at earthlink.net
Thu Apr 12 15:15:42 MDT 2007
Yes. I can perfectly describe the tone of Wurlitzer console and spinet and micro-grand pianos that I tune: I believe the technically correct terminology is "Harsh whiney crap."
Alan Barnard
Salem, MO
----- Original message ----------------------------------------
From: "David Boyce" <David at piano.plus.com>
To: "Pianotech List" <pianotech at ptg.org>
Received: 4/12/2007 12:33:15 PM
Subject: Franz Mohr in Moscow
>I enjoyed watching that. Mohr says in the short film that Horowitz likes a
>certain "nasal-ness" in the tone. That set me to thinking again about how
>tricky it is to find adjectives to describe the subtleties of piano tone.
>What do we say of the sound of a Steinway concert grand in comparison to a
>Yamaha? We may be able to tell them apart in good quality recordings, but
>can we DESCRIBE the differences? Especially to a non-expert?
>There is a cliché I really dislike - it's when someone describes a fine
>piano as have a "bell-like" tone. Yuk yuk yuk! Who wants a piano that
>sounds like bells? Many bells have such a muddle of harmonics that you can
>hardly tell what note they are. It would be a really great compliment to a
>set of bells to say that they had a "piano-like tone", I reckon!
>Do any have adjectives they would apply to particular brands, or that they
>tend to use in decribing tone quality? I'd like to hear what others say
>before venturing any of my own......
>Best,
>David.
More information about the Pianotech
mailing list