Tuning lever length
AlliedPianoCraft
AlliedPianoCraft at hotmail.com
Sat Feb 23 06:00:32 MST 2008
Jon, excellent explanation. That is the way I tune, but I would not have been able to put it into word as you have.
I know that there will be an argument here soon about which way is better. Let me say this. Two of my good friends at the factory I worked at, were excellent tuners. Stable, dead on tunings. One was a jerker and the other was a smoothly. It's all about preference.
Al Guecia
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Page" <jonpage at comcast.net>
To: <pianotech at ptg.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 7:29 AM
Subject: Tuning lever length
> I'm a smooth-pull tuner, applying slight impact only when appropriate.
> I feel the torque of the pin and overpull accordingly and make a
> diminishing series of + & - motions to set the pin and string with
> a final slight + motion to keep the front section of string length
> at a minutely higher tension than on the speaking length side
> of the counter bearing friction. A lower tension on this forward
> string segment would be more apt to allow this lower tension to
> creep across the counter bearing making for a less stable tuning,
> a final + lilt (nudging pin torque) braces the string better.
>
> As with moving or lifting a piano, apply force and increase effort
> until the desired motion is achieved, don't heave your body into it.
>
> I carry two stationary levers 9.5" & 11.5" and a Hale 10.5" with
> interchangeable heads for strut clearance. Which one I'll use
> depends on pin torque and clearance issues. For concert work
> I prefer the 9.5".
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Jon Page
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech/attachments/20080223/54a0f8c3/attachment.html
More information about the Pianotech
mailing list